Calling the Kettle Black
October 29, 2006
Democrats cannot be trusted to control Congress because they do not know how to win the war in Iraq.
3 Comments
Comments are closed.
in the dirt since history began
-
"We have no words to waste on you. When you reach out your vaunted strong hands for our palaces and purpled ease, we will show you what strength is. In roar of shell and shrapnel and in whine of machine-guns will our answer be couched. We will grind you revolutionists down under our heel, and we shall walk upon your faces. The world is ours, we are its lords, and ours it shall remain. As for the host of labor, it has been in the dirt since history began, and I read history aright. And in the dirt it shall remain so long as I and mine and those that come after us have the power. There is the word. It is the king of words—Power. Not God, not Mammon, but Power. Pour it over your tongue till it tingles with it. Power."
MAIL:
stumplane "at" gmail "dot" com Recent Comments
Hello Angels on BACK-TALK Grant on Bradley Manning Is Being … cnihilist on She Kidnapped HERself Hamas Abedin on She Kidnapped HERself The Problem With Lib… on Human Nature, Morality and Pro… 
Jacob Bacharach- I Blame the Patriarchy
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- BLKDGRD
- The Glass Eye That Stares at Me in Amazement from the Bronze Mantel
- Ridiculous How the Space Between 3 Violins Can Threaten Our Poetry
- Until One of Our Daughters Shouted: "It Was Right in Front of You, Right in Front of Your Eyes, and You Didn't See
- The Rhyme Between Lost and Most
- Huzza Then, This Is the Mazurka of the Hollow Log!
- You Must Come to Them Sideways
- Taken Behind a Great Echoless Door, or: Born 86 Years Ago Today
- The Carrion-Stinking Dog Who Is Calf of Human and Wolf
- With Consciousness Barely Floating the Slippery Curve Is Approaching
- i would be eight people and then the difficulties vanish
- The Crow’s Eye
- eye of the storm
- MAGA -- A Rough Beast Slouching Toward Bethlehem, Not Just in Pennsylvania
- Getting out of this world alive versus being acclaimed as the absolute best at something/
- Real, fundamental change or more Progressive "Tales told by an idiot, full of sound and fury and signifying nothing"
- OK, I Figured Out Gaslighting, but What the Hell is Cancel Culture?
- Nailed it...Sideways!
- The Sound of Silence Can Be Really a Lot Better Than the Make a Noise Approach
- The Reverse Placebo Effect and the Miracle of Psychiatric Medication
- Freedom, Fear and the Knock in the Middle of the Night...
- things i wrote this year
- homo econonomicus: replaced by saints
- ladypoverty
- False Dichotomy
- FAIR is once again unfair to the Syrian people
- The criminalization of poverty
- The market finds a way to make the job search more terrible
- On the killing of Ezell Ford and the impotence of civilian review boards
- Protests and prisons
- A review of 'Syrian Notebooks'
- From Argentina to Iraq: I have an opinion
- Hillary the Hawk
- What six weeks at Vice looks like
- Netanyahu, Sisi and Assad: Peas in a pod
- Once Upon A Time…
- Stop Me Before I Vote Again
- Dennis Perrin
- Guys From Area 51
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Fafblog!
Stump Lane 
Theoretically Dems do not know how to win the war in Iraq, but;
it has already been proven that Repubs do not know how to win the war in Iraq.
There are so many words in the original sentence with extremely flexible meaning: Democrats, trust, control, because, win, war. I’d say that the statement borders on the totally meaningless. Is there a clearly delineated war? What, for that matter, is “Iraq”? (Who drew the borders? Is it a “nation-state”?) How is “control” of Congress linked, specifically [and causally, in the above statement], with the war in Iraq? (I.e. doesn’t Congress do more than wage war?) Who, exactly, is doing the trusting here? (The paraphrase (nearly a direct quote) was as I’m sure is clear culled from a couple of Bush’s recent speeches, in Indiana and California.)
I should have known it was a trick question.
My comment works as a Dem response to such criticism, though. Equally meaningless, ergo equally potentially “true.” Calling the Pot Black, if you will.