How ‘old guard’ of you, SE. Do you favor a constitutional amendment to protect traditional spaghetti from the evils that would surely be wrought by legitimizing non-skid square spaghetti?
Comments are closed.
"We have no words to waste on you. When you reach out your vaunted strong hands for our palaces and purpled ease, we will show you what strength is. In roar of shell and shrapnel and in whine of machine-guns will our answer be couched. We will grind you revolutionists down under our heel, and we shall walk upon your faces. The world is ours, we are its lords, and ours it shall remain. As for the host of labor, it has been in the dirt since history began, and I read history aright. And in the dirt it shall remain so long as I and mine and those that come after us have the power. There is the word. It is the king of words—Power. Not God, not Mammon, but Power. Pour it over your tongue till it tingles with it. Power."
So many people fail to take a position on the important issues. I’m glad he’s in favor of non-skid square spaghetti–whatever the fuck that is.
Non-skid, huh? Well, I’ve had some in my time that appeared to be made of Goodyear rubber…
Get off the fence, JR. Either you’re for non-skid square spaghetti or you’re against it.
I hope you haven’t inadvertantly given away any trade secrets there, Neil.
I’ve flip-flopped on the whole ‘square spaghetti’ issue. I was against it, but now I’m for it. I think…
I am against square spaghetti. I am for circular spaghetti.
How ‘old guard’ of you, SE. Do you favor a constitutional amendment to protect traditional spaghetti from the evils that would surely be wrought by legitimizing non-skid square spaghetti?